Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Opinion  >  Current Article

Chemtrails: Hundreds of tons of toxic nano aluminum and barium are being sprayed daily

By   /   June 4, 2014  /   21 Comments

    Print       Email

“Chemtrail Cough” is Sweeping the Nation — Death by Respiratory Disease Has Skyrocketed

 

Hundreds of tons of toxic nano aluminum and barium are being sprayed daily in the skies. 

While everyone continues to talk about unimportant issues like Ukraine, mass shooters and Bilderberg (all distractions in my view) the greatest environmental catastrophe that our species has ever seen is unfolding right in front of us and barely a whimper of resistance is forming from libertarians and truth seekers.

Have you noticed that everyone around you is congested and coughing? I am calling this new syndrome “chemtrail cough.”

My wife is coughing, I am coughing and now even our dogs are coughing. In just four years death by respiratory disease has skyrocketed from 8th in the world to 3rd and possibly even 2nd. If someone in congress receives a letter with a little bit of white powder in it the capitol is evacuated and the media freaks out and starts screaming “terrorists.”

However, right over their heads, hundreds of tons of nano aluminum and barium are being sprayed on them daily and yet nobody seems to care.

The aluminum and barium (blanketing us all day) dissipates and falls to the ground in the early evening. The planes then return to their bases to refuel, rearm and get ready for the next attack the next morning

Read the complete story from the website Humans Are Free Click Here

 

 Story posted by Branson Hunter

Incoming search terms:

  • chemtrails over mesa july 2014
    Print       Email

About the author

Branson Hunter

(This story was posted by Cactus Thorn contributor Branson Hunter)

"The ends do not justify the means." If you use illegal mean to accomplish a legal and even desirable result, the good result does not make the bad means you used justifiable.

21 Comments

  1. Dan OBrien Dan OBrien says:

    In 1850 a American white male could expect to live 38.3 years, with the help of Monsanto and Chemtrails we now can expect to live to 80 years old.

    What a world we live in!! Here is to better living through chemistry.

    Source: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005140.html

  2. So let’s all thank Monsanto for keeping us alive longer on toxic chemical Unbelievable. Lets also kiss their feet for foisting sterilized seeds in the market place.

  3. Dan OBrien Dan OBrien says:

    Yeppers! Let’s do thank Monsanto and Archer Daniels, Dupont and all those who have extended human life by decades…..

  4. Go for it. Embrace your friends.

  5. Dan OBrien Dan OBrien says:

    I wish to thank the following Chemists for their contributions in extending the lives of mankind. I’ dgive them a hug if I could.

    Louis Pasteur (1822–1895)
    George Washington Carver (1864–1943)
    Rosalind Franklin (1920–1958)
    Antoine Lavoisier (1743–1794)
    Linus Pauling (1901–1994)
    Joseph Priestley (1733–1804)
    Dmitri Mendeleev (1834–1907)
    Alexander Fleming (1881-1955)
    Edward Jenner (1749-1823)
    etc…etc…etc

    I would like to thank the scientists and farmers who have fed the world with GMOs like; corn, soya beans, editable cotton seed, Jatropha, golden rice, flood resistant rice, sugar beets, yeast, Cassava, Papaya, non-toxic Castor Beans, just to name a few plants that have made our lives worth living.

    Modern science created by modern scientists, employed by modern corporations have done more to extend the lives of humans than any government or politician.

    so yes I would very much like to give them a hug.

  6. Louis Pasteur and chemtrails???

    If you enjoy GMO foods,bon appétit.

  7. Steve Spear Steve Spear says:

    Okay time to take down the “chemtrails” story.

    Surely these way out of normal conspiracy is everywhere people have never seen the films of swarms of B-17′s and B-29′s flying towards victory and leaving “CONTRAILs” all over the place.

    Jeesh!

  8. Steve, I’m taken back that you are uninformed on this subject. Best to keep an open mind. Nonetheless, the story is posted in the “opinion” section. I see no problem with that. Lets not begin to advocate censorship on opinions stories because you may disagree with the content.

    There are vast differences between chemtrains and “vapor” trails. The government no longer denies chemtrails and has fessed-up to it. It is a known fact.

    Postscript: 364 readers have viewed this story. 118 are users while 246 are visitors that are not logged in as users. Obviously, it’s a quasi-interesting view for those readers. A story that in a short time has more views that many stories. The problem with the STAR and TRAIL is they don’t publish stories out of the box. Cactus Thorns has always been different. I hope it continues to be an open forum. Readers have a choice… read a story or move on to another story.

    Respectfully, Branson

    • Steve Spear Steve Spear says:

      Who is “they”? I missed that part in the full story at the link.

    • Dan OBrien Dan OBrien says:

      And who is to say of those 246 readers are not in my corner and not yours?

      Seriously, to what purpose or what nefarious end do you believe the Obama Administration allows this “poisoning of the air” to continue?

      Lets stretch this conspiracy theory beyond the “Bush Did it” level and ask yourself.

      Is Obama out to kill us all?

      If “the STAR and TRAIL don’t publish stories out of the box,” then why isn’t someone in the administration following up on this story?

      Let me suppose something here….. Like any other débâcles or disaster of this President, He is unaware of it until….. Hell he reads Branson Hunter or the AP or even “the STAR and TRAIL” before he hears about it?

      I am not about to think that Presidents since Truman, on both sides of the fence, have been allowing “THEY” to poison us all. If so…. to what purpose?

      Come on this crap has been spewed for decades, and we continue to live longer, we grow more food, the water is clearer and the air is visibly cleaner than it was when we were children.

      Do they spray? Yeah, they seed clouds, they dump fire retardants, jets leak fuel. Do I think it is a conspiracy to do harm to the citizens of the world?

      Hell No!

      PS You posted to get a discussion going…. That you succeeded in. Just because I don’t believe in fairies and leprechauns, does not mean that during the Celebration of the Green you and the Star and Trail can try to prove they exist. It is a lot of fun to discuss.

      • @Dano and @Steve:

        Dan: It does not matter what position a reader takes after viewing this story. What is important is the opportunity for a reader to view a story when they choose look at it. In this instance I’d say it caught the interest of readers, as follow:

        total: 522
        users: 162
        visitors:
        Much higher than most normal posts in a short prior of time.

        Steve: I know of no evidence or documentation that chemtrails are as you allege a conspiracy theory. Dan recognized they exist. All the info is out there for inquisitive minds.

        Good, bad, dangerous that is all up for discussion. I don’t understand the question, “Who are they”? But I do understand that (nano) aluminum and barium in the bodies of life forms is toxic and can and will result in long term health hazards.

        I take issue with the way the author’s presented his story. He ought have left out the part about his wife, “Ukraine, mass shooters and Bilderberg.” All of which are distractions and have no little to do with chemtrails.

        I’m guessing neither you nor Dan linked to the story and actually read it. True or false?

        Are chemtrails ((nano) aluminum and barium) good for the environment and do they make people live longer?

        • Steve Spear Steve Spear says:

          Branson, The story refers to “they” are spraying the air with “chemtrails” so who is “they”.

          I have researched this before and what I have found are extreme left environmentalists who have concocted this conspiracy that “someone” is sparing the air with this stuff that the article mentions and it is simply not true.

          So again who are the “they” that are spraying this stuff???

          • Dan OBrien Dan OBrien says:

            THEY can’t be Monsanto because we would be pelted with Corn Seed and Soya Beans from on high.

            No NO that just wouldn’t do.

          • @Steve: First, I would like to know if you are unequivocally debunking that toxic nano aluminum and barium are being sprayed the skies.

            This has little to do with radical environmentalists. It has everything to do with science. Whether on balance, chemtrails do more more good than harm is fair game for investigations and discussing.

            But arguing that chemtrails is a hoax or conspiracy theory — is about as pointless as arguing the geocentric model that Earth is at the orbital center of all of all celestial bodies, including our own star. Or arguing the Earth is flat.

            Take a look at the image of chemtrails: are you holding these are vapor (water) trails?

            http://www.rense.com/general11/chmmill.htm

            • Steve Spear Steve Spear says:

              Yes Branson I am debunking the “chemtrails”. Did my research and not one site can identify who “they” are. But plenty of sites can afford any reader the truth about “contrails” and “chemtrails”. Simply because a contrail may last for hours is not indicative of anything other then the atmospheric conditions at the time when that plane or those planes were flying at altitudes that cause these types of things.

              These things are not happening due to “nano” this or “barium” that as the proponents would like some to believe.

              Sorry my friend. I may be a lefty but I fly around where the wing meets with the body not at the “tip” of the far end or the “extreme” end of it.

  9. Hi Steve. I am not the voice of the author of this story. My intentions is to not defend this story. As far as all those viewers (now reaching 688) I was put off with the suggestion the story should be taken down. That would have deprived 688 (and climbing) the opportunity to view the controversial issues in the story’s Link.

    They are obviously (I believe) components of the military, government, scientist, and corporate entities. Be sure I am not going to bust my butt trying to convince you or anyone else. Been there, done that in CT. It goes nowhere.

    Humm, Steve, I didn’t know you are a lefty. I though you were a Democrat. You should thus understand all of which in our country may not be as it appears. There is so much going on behind the public’s eye…

    OFF TOPIC: … Just as on a smaller scale much is going on with local city council and they shove the public aside like Goats. They have their own agenda. They (council members) are on a power trip that disenfranchises the public and taxpayers.

    Keep those “lefty” skills tuned-up and sharp. The power group in this city needs diversity.

    • Dan OBrien Dan OBrien says:

      Just when we thought there was going to be this Kumbaya moment…….

    • Steve Spear Steve Spear says:

      Copy on that Branson. I did not mean to imply in my posts that I thought you were a believer or not and that is immaterial.

      I just like at times to debunk what is considered by most main stream people as stuff that should be left to bar talk and such and not given very much credibility.

      The hit rate at this point might just be to see this dialogue that you and I and Dan have going and not at all related to the story at all.

      CT is as much about information as it is about entertainment for those that wish in some way to want to be in the mix but for whatever reason do not find it within themselves to step forward and speak.

      Instead they feel satiated with the opinions of us who step into the arena.

      They are all good people and not wanting to post or offer their own thoughts is totally their prerogative and I have always respected that position of the majority of citizens in our city.

      “They” the citizens have a rightful expectation that those they elect will do the people’s business. They also have the right to allow me, or you, or Dan to express our opinions that may in fact meet their expectations.

      What is a pity is that not one present councilmember will publish in the newspaper, or publish here, or publish on the radio.

      They do not initiate ideas they react to their own actions which of late have been causing negative reactions from the citizens for their reelection.

      Sorry, off topic at best I would say.

      • As dano noted… a Kumbaya moment.

        Steve, I appreciate the fact that we can peaceable disagree on one of the issues at the top of my political concerns.

        You wrote, “What is a pity is that not one present councilmember will publish in the newspaper, or publish here, or publish on the radio”.

        Off Topic: As you heard on the May 27 Up Close show, Harris’ big message to the public was to chastise them: He was a self-righteous grumbler on that show. At issue: He encouraged the public at a council meeting to talk to him after the meeting about (as I remember) the hoopla over giving Joe the boot).

        Then he went into his usual physiological mode… attempting to promote himself as a nice and highly compassionate fellow. He hammered away that nobody came up to ask him questions (but a reporter). Bbalderdash.

        It is up to Harris to reach out to the public. He fell on his sword like the other four when it comes to genuinely seeking public input or keeping the public informed. I loathe it when people try and pull the physiological card.

        You can see it coming with Harris… he’ll gets all emotions at that moment when he speaks, projecting he’s such a compassionate council guy who stands with the public.

        All five of these council people distance the public. They keep the public dumbed down and at arm’s length.

        Cora and Harris are imposters. Cora lied and faked her platform. She was all chummy with the public, however, after she was sworn in and seated she took off her mask.

        Harris, as you heard, is now saying he’s going to restart holding regular office hours; or regularly meet with the public for coffee or whatever; he’ll listen to their concerns; he’s going to be transparent; he’s going to try and get facts out to the public; to wit, after first getting permission from bond attorney Munoz.

        Harris old platform to serve all the people was an empty promise. Why should concerned voters believe him now. I think Harris is sincere to himself when he shifts to physiological mode… that he believes his own BS.

        Some people actually believe their own BS. Harris is in this corner. Harris deserves to get the boot in November 2014.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
UA-9539515-1 e0a5d0bb00574423a5afb96d6b854248