This is going to be a costly lawsuit against Yucca Valley. It deals with interim Town Manager Shane Stueckle‘s and Town Council’s management of a developer. As you can see below there are eight defendants. The complaint was filed on January 13, 2014. Yucca Valley will have thirty days in which to respond to the Summons and Complaint after the town has been served.
The record reflects that the Complaint has been filed in San Bernardino Superior Court, but not yet served on Yucca Valley.
It appears that the town council inter alia may have another problem with failing to provide proper notice to impacted parties.
I have been informed and believe, as following: “The attorney accused Shane of failing to return phone calls, and arranging for action by the Town Council with inadequate notice to the owners of the subdivision. The action was apparently precipitated by the Town withdrawing permits for the subdivision.”
Case CIVDS1400401 – MIRAGE FRONT PROPERTIES LLC VS YUCCA VALLEY ET AL
|Party Number||Party Type||Party Name||Attorney||Party Status|
|1||PLAINTIFF||MIRAGE FRONT PROPERTIES LLC||LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS W. HARRIS, JR||First Paper Fee Paid|
|2||DEFENDANT||YUCCA VALLEY ESTATES LLC||Unrepresented||Serve Required (WaitS)|
|3||DEFENDANT||DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY||Unrepresented||Serve Required (WaitS)|
|4||DEFENDANT||TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY||Unrepresented||Serve Required (WaitS)|
|5||DEFENDANT||PACIFIC EQUITY PROPERTIES LLC||Unrepresented||Serve Required (WaitS)|
|6||DEFENDANT||HERBERT L PORTER||Unrepresented||Serve Required (WaitS)|
|7||DEFENDANT||CF PROPERTIES LLC||Unrepresented||Serve Required (WaitS)|
|8||DEFENDANT||CF PROPERTIES LLC||Unrepresented||Serve Required (WaitS)|
|9||DEFENDANT||EDWARD F EATON||Unrepresented||Serve Required (WaitS)|
You might be interested
Incoming search terms:
- Case CIVDS1400401 – MIRAGE FRONT PROPERTIES LLC VS YUCCA VALLEY ET AL
- serve required waits