Only in Canada – No Picking (your nose) Law
For those of you not following the news over in the Great White North I will fill you in a little bit. Last month the ‘distracted driving’ law came into effect, where-as you will not be able to chat away on a cell phone while driving without risk of incurring a fine of up to $500. It seems one Canadian politician wants to take it one step further!
Jim Bradlley (Ontario’s transportation minister) made this statement Thursday after telling reporters he was proud of the new legislation he helped draft and as they walked away he mentioned his plans to make this law much more encompassing in the near future. He was quoted as saying; “Sure talking on a cell phone while driving is dangerous but there are many other activities occuring during driving that are just as dangerous if not more-so.” “For example the other day I was almost side-swiped by a man that was completely distracted while picking his nose, and I don’t mean just a nose scratch – he was in up to his knuckle”.
There has been testing done that has shown that picking your nose while driving is even more dangerous than using a cell phone because of the high occurrences of physical injury while conducting this type of behavior. I would like to see all types of distractions lead to a hefty fine, my advice for this particular offense would be an $850 fine.
At least one politician finds those comments worrying. “Everyone should realize there is no place this government will not go intruding into private lives,” Conservative MPP Randy Hillier said. He went on to say, “what is next? No eating broccoli with dinner due to the possibility of passing of gas into the atmosphere thereby increasing global warming?”
Experts have questioned the effectiveness of distracted driving laws. In other jurisdictions they have not always changed drivers’ habits. After an initial reduction in New York, for example, cellphone use was reportedly back to pre-ban rates within one year.
The insurance industry says the new law is a good first step in making distracted driving socially unacceptable. In fact Bill Crespen of Walden’s Insurance says, “personally we would like to see all distractions result in large fines, whether it is picking your nose, applying make-up or talking on a cell phone – they can all potentially kill you”.

Related posts:





















Story Comments
Terry I agree with you and have been saying that for years now. They repaved two mile road past Sunrise ...
Thanks for the info Mike/Betty, sounds like fun, sorry I can't make it this year. PS. Love the "Pink Floyd The ...
If they made the shoulders wide enough to ride without impeding traffic , it would cover far more area than ...
Yep. It was quite the show. When I went in, I already knew that any argument against the trip would ...
Cora, I think it's correct to say that PART of your property taxes go to the RDA.
Dan, I know you are wrong. But I'll have to wait for my next tax statement to see what it ...
I agree. I have only attempted to park in the plaza on several occasions and found it not to be ...
Someone wasn’t thinking when they designed the Plaza redevelopment. True That. from a consumer standpoint they reduced parking and made ...
I am more concerned about the young people that I see walking along the path only to run across two ...
Larry if it is property tax increase, it is going to the RDA or was period. I live in the ...
Make all three bicyclists in town better targets. Bike paths, one of the biggest wastes of money. For the amount ...
Well not any more larry..
I believe the bike paths are funded out of a seperate account/grant. You may want to call the fiscal officer ...
hey Larry I have a question, I was walking East on two mile the other day and found the walking/bike ...
you are correct, the 5th is a point, I just thought that there were more important issues that needed to ...