That’s a 12 cents add-on for a 12 oz can of soda. That seems a little excessive. That’s close to 10 teaspoons of sugar in a can of soda. That’s excessive too. So is the fructose, corn syrup and 250 empty calories in a can of soda. While I opposed the defeated tax initiative on new and excessive cigarettes tax, this proposed tax is too much — but a lesser tax I would favor.
A proposal to tax sweetened soda in California has renewed debate over the state’s role in preventing obesity among its residents.State Sen. Bill Monning (D-Carmel) has introduced legislation that would levy a 1-cent-per-ounce tax on sweetened beverages, including sodas, as part of an effort to fight obesity among young people. The money paid by beverage distributors under SB 622 would go to a Children’s Health Promotion Fund to pay for a statewide childhood obesity prevention program. “This bill will combat the obesity crisis and ensure that our children– and future generations of Californians– are not doomed to a shorter life expectancy and can instead live longer, healthier lives,” Monning said. In addition to funding the program, Monning said the measure “is intended to discourage excessive consumption of sweetened beverages by increasing the price of these products.’” The legislation was condemned Monday by the food-industry backed Center for Consumer Freedom, which said the levy will not slim down consumers. “Taxes shouldn’t be a tool for social engineering or an instrument to penalize Californians for doing nothing wrong,” said J. Justin Wilson, senior research analyst at the center. “Residents of California don’t need a PhD in nutrition to tell them that eating or drinking too much of anything is unhealthy; it only takes a little common sense and personal responsibility.”