Local Code Enforcement head Mike Romage was actually brilliant. He dodged and parried like Earl Flynn as he explained that as much as COW would like to make a big deal of things there wasn’t much of anything to make a big deal about.
OHV complaints are way down. Tickets are way down and it seems that everyone except the Cow “Steer-ing Committee” who wanted to talk about threats and intimidation.
Corbin sat quietly as he took lessons from Phil on how to obfuscate and divert attention
Klasky was intent on blaming all his problems on Cactus Thorns. Yeah you got it. He is trying to convince our New DA to investigate Cactus Thorns.
He still is with the Anti-Semitic crap. And lord he spends a great deal of time trying to convince others about his gender preference. I got to tell you I could care less about Phil’s ethic background, religion, or who he sleeps with. My issues with the guy are purely political.
Mr. Klasky is a vortex public person that has thrust himself into several controversial public issues and has taken a leadership role in opposition to what many believe is liberty and freedom itself.
I welcome the District Attorney to find a single intemidation or threat on this blog directed to Mr. Klasky.
I say further if Mr. Klasky thinks he has a civil tort bring it on.
I submit that the following California State Constitutional Article protects this blog from unwarranted abridgment.
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS SEC. 2. (a) Every person may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of this right. A law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or press. (b) A publisher, editor, reporter, or other person connected with or employed upon a newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publication, or by a press association or wire service, or any person who has been so connected or employed, shall not be adjudged in contempt by a judicial, legislative, or administrative body, or any other body having the power to issue subpoenas, for refusing to disclose the source of any information procured while so connected or employed for publication in a newspaper, magazine or other periodical publication, or for refusing to disclose any unpublished information obtained or prepared in gathering, receiving or processing of information for communication to the public. Nor shall a radio or television news reporter or other person connected with or employed by a radio or television station, or any person who has been so connected or employed, be so adjudged in contempt for refusing to disclose the source of any information procured while so connected or employed for news or news commentary purposes on radio or television, or for refusing to disclose any unpublished information obtained or prepared in gathering, receiving or processing of information for communication to the public. As used in this subdivision, "unpublished information" includes information not disseminated to the public by the person from whom disclosure is sought, whether or not related information has been disseminated and includes, but is not limited to, all notes, outtakes, photographs, tapes or other data of whatever sort not itself disseminated to the public through a medium of communication, whether or not published information based upon or related to such material has been disseminated.